# Repairable products keynoteArclight Home

64% needed one part

Not a replacement product. One failed, replaceable component was behind 3,072 of 4,800 returns.

Product councilDecision deck
02 Return evidenceArclight Home

We are replacing mostly working products

4,800
returns reviewed across three product lines
3,072
needed one replaceable component
62%
of serviceable claims still receive a replacement unit

The failure is often small. The product-level consequence is not.

Source: user brief. Fictional Arclight return review, January to December 2026.

Repairability case02 / 09
03 Product journeyArclight Home

Inaccessibility turns faults into replacements

Today
Fault

One part fails

Slow access

18 min to component

Replacement

62% of serviceable claims

Repairable
Fault
Identify module
Replace
Return to use
Why now

Median authorized repair takes 46 minutes because the enclosure uses 14 fastener types and two glued structural seams.

Source: user brief.

Architecture determines outcome03 / 09
04 Failure concentrationArclight Home

Five components explain the 64%

Share of all returns
Power boards21% Pumps16% Switches11% Heating elements9% Seals7% 01020%

Design for the known failures.Make these modules accessible, replaceable and available.

Source: user brief. Shares are of all 4,800 returns.

Target the recurring faults04 / 09
05 Teardown proofArclight Home

Modular architecture makes repair practical

MeasureCurrentModular prototype
Time to reach failed component18 min4 min
Fastener types144
Glued structural seams20
Replaceable without soldering5 of 1110 of 11
Successful first-time reassembly73%97%

The prototype reached the failed component 14 minutes faster.

Source: user brief. Controlled teardown of 30 units.

Prototype evidence05 / 09
06 Customer signalArclight Home

Customers reward a credible parts promise

71%
would choose a five-year parts promise at the same price
48%
would pay €12 more
67%
said a visible repair score would increase trust
Evidence boundary

Directional pilot findings from 600 fictional owners. These are not market-wide claims.

Source: user brief.

Trust and choice06 / 09
07 Pilot economicsArclight Home

The pilot pays back in 1.1 years

€0.60m
engineering and tooling investment
€0.57m
gross annual benefit after unit-cost impact
Steady-state value

€1.06m annual avoided replacement and logistics cost, less €2.70 per unit across 180,000 annual units.

Payback after launch

1.1 years

Source: user brief. €0.60m equals €0.42m engineering plus €0.18m tooling. Benefits are expected values at steady state.

Better architecture, positive return07 / 09
08 Two-product pilotArclight Home

Two products will prove six repair targets

Lumen KettleDrift Brewer
Pilot measureCurrent evidenceApproval target
Median component access time18 minUnder 6 min
Fastener types14No more than 5
Glued structural seams20
Priority components replaceable without soldering5 of 119 of 11
Repair completion38%At least 70%
Parts, instructions and pricesNot specifiedPublish for 5 years after last sale

Source: user brief.

Measurable by design08 / 09
09 Council decisionArclight Home
One ask

Approve the repairability pilot today

01

Release €0.60m

Fund engineering and tooling for the Lumen Kettle and Drift Brewer.

02

Name the owner

Appoint a design-for-repair owner by 15 September 2027.

03

Return with evidence

Review prototype results at the January 2028 product council.

Make repairability a core design principle09 / 09
1 / 6 Save a PDF at unpaper.ai