Make them feel it

One idea per slide, given the whole stage. Big type, deep space, a single accent doing all the pointing — built to land, not just to inform.

02 The idea
Spotlight

Say the one thing.If a slide carries two ideas, they each deserve their own. Subtract until only the point is left.

02 / 30
03 The approach

Three principles, nothing more

01

One idea per slide

Give the single point the whole stage and room to breathe.

02

Type does the work

Scale and weight set the hierarchy — not boxes, rules or clutter.

03

One accent, used rarely

Keep 90% of the ink quiet so the 10% can shout.

03 / 30
04 Focus
1

One number, given the whole stage, lands harder than a wall of them.

04 / 30
05 The claim
Insight

Attention is the budget. Spend it on one thing — and they remember it.

05 / 30
06 A line

Good design is as little design as possible.

— Dieter Rams

06 / 30
07 The shift
From

A wall of bullets nobody recalls.

To

One line they can’t forget.

07 / 30
08 Next
Part two

Now make it yours.

08 / 30
09 Proof

Three numbers, no more

recall versus a bulleted slide.
1
idea carried per slide.
90%
of the ink kept deliberately quiet.
09 / 30
10 Open canvas

How the business actually fits together

One page: who we serve, what we must own, and where the money comes from.

Who we serve
Mid-market teams shipping a deck most weeks
What they get
A finished, on-brand file in one pass
How they arrive
Word of mouth, then the free prompt page
Must own
The template contract and the converter — the two things nobody else has
Can rent
Hosting, payments, the model itself
What it costs
Engineering time; almost no marginal cost per deck
Where the money is
Teams standardising on one deck format, paying per seat
10 / 30
11 Progress

Where the rollout stands

Teams migrated to the templateon track86%
Twelve of fourteen teams have moved; the last two land next sprint.
Decks converting without a manual fixwatching64%
Charts are clean; the remaining gap is hand-drawn diagrams.
Legacy files still on the old masterblocked31%
Waiting on the brand refresh before we touch them.
11 / 30
12 Activation

Of 1,000 trials, 163 become paying teams

Two steps — the first invite and week two — cost more than the other five together.

1,000Started a trial
−46Never opened it
−131No data imported
−86Stalled in setup
−239Never invited a colleague
−217Lapsed in week two
−94Budget refused
−25Churned in month two
163Paying
12 / 30
13 Architecture

Four tiers, one shared foundation

01

What customers touch

Everything a person opens, and nothing that stores.

Web appMobilePartner widget
02

The API edge

One gateway: auth, rate limits, and every audit record.

AuthRate limitsAudit log
03

Domain services

Nine services, each owning its own store.

BillingDocumentsIdentity
04

The data foundation

One warehouse every tier reads from, and nothing writes around.

WarehouseEvent bus
13 / 30
14 Data platform

Four systems, and everything crosses one link

Three of these edges fail loudly. The replication into the warehouse fails quietly.

01 · Ingest

Event stream

38 sources, change data capture

02 · Warehouse

Analytics store

The only place all four agree

03 · Models

Semantic layer

412 metric definitions

04 · Activation

Dashboards and sync

What the business acts on

replication · 12 min lag
nightly build
governed metrics only
write-back
single point of failure
14 / 30
15 The engine

The loop compounds, and one step leaks

Every turn should add users. Activation is where the turn loses them.

More users

Every new team adds sources

Better data

Volume sharpens the defaults

Better product

Fewer steps to a finished deck

Each turn should cost less
than the one before it
sharpens
attracts
feeds
activation drop −38% lag 11 days
15 / 30
16 The plan

Four quarters, three workstreams, two dependencies

Everything below the migration waits on the migration.

Q1Q2Q3Q4
PlatformAna R.

Billing migration

Old ledger retired

Second region

EU write path live

ProductJonas W.

Usage pricing

Needs the new ledger

Self-serve upgrade

No sales call under €5k

blocked until Q2
SupportMei L.

Ticket triage

One queue, one owner

Migration backlog

Two regions to answer for

needs 2 hires
16 / 30
17 Compare

Two paths, and only one of them is reversible

 Build in housePartner
Time to first release9 months10 weeks
Cost, year one€1.4m€480k
Who owns the roadmapUsShared
Reversible?Yes, slowlyOnly at renewal

Source: build-vs-buy assessment, February

17 / 30
18 The number
What changed
11×
more decks made per week than a year ago

Not because the tool got faster. Because it stopped asking people to know what a template is.

18 / 30
19 Spend

Spend is tracking plan; the gap closes in Q4

Cumulative spend against budget, €000.

0 700 1400 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
PlanActual
19 / 30
20 The ask

Two decisions, both today

Decision 1

Fund the partner pilot

€480k releases the team in ten weeks instead of nine months.

Decide by 14 Feb · sponsor: CFO

Decision 2

Freeze the in-house build

Stops parallel spend; the work is recoverable until the March gate.

Decide by 28 Feb · sponsor: CTO

20 / 30
21 Risks

Three risks, each with an owner and a date

RiskMitigationOwnerState
Partner capacity in Q2Second vendor pre-qualifiedPMOWatch
Data migration windowDry run booked for 12 FebR. OkaforAt risk
Team releaseBackfill agreed with the CTOEng. managerOn track

Source: programme risk log, February

21 / 30
22 The numbers

The rebrand moved the numbers, and then it kept moving them

Qualified enquiries per month, since the new identity shipped.

Jan Feb Mar Apr 180240410530

Source: enquiry log, four months to April

22 / 30
23 The quarter

Three numbers decide the quarter

68% of visitors reach the pricing page was 51% before the rewrite
41% of new revenue came from one campaign concentration to watch
92% of customers renewed the one to protect
23 / 30
24 The mix

Where the campaign budget actually went

Two thirds of it never touched the work anybody remembers.

27%
19%
12%
8%
34%
Paid media€216k
Agency retainer€152k
Events€96k
Tooling€64k
The work itself€272k

Source: marketing ledger, full year

24 / 30
25 Positioning

Everyone trades distinctive against easy to buy

The two things buyers say out loud — and the corner nobody has taken.

More distinctive ↑
Us, after this
Heritage brand
Us, today
Challenger
Discount range
Easier to buy →
25 / 30
26 The plan

Four moves, one screen

Move 1

Name the audience

One reader, described specifically enough to argue with.

Move 2

Cut the claims

Three survive. The rest were reassurance, not argument.

Move 3

Show the work

Evidence beside the claim, on the same slide.

Move 4

Ask for something

A named decision, a date, and one owner.

Four cards hold four parallel points; use a flow when they happen in order.

26 / 30
27 Scorecard

Score them where the numbers run out

Studio
Cost
Speed
Craft
Fit
Keep it in house
Network agency
Two-person studio

○ none · ◕ partial · ● strong

Source: team assessment, illustrative

27 / 30
28 Takeaway

If you remember one thing

Key takeaway

The identity was never the bottleneck. The bottleneck was that nobody could produce anything in it without asking us first.

28 / 30
29 Trade-offs

What to keep, what to drop

Keep

  • One typeface, used with nerve
  • The photography we already own
  • A palette anyone can apply alone

Drop

  • The second logo lockup
  • Six-week approval cycles
  • Rules nobody can find
29 / 30
30 Close
The craft

Restraint is the design.

Replace this with your one idea — and resist adding a second.

30 / 30
1 / 6 Save a PDF at unpaper.ai