Project Atlas
rollout status

Overall status: Amber. Two distribution centers are live and stable, Rivermark is ready, but integration defects have consumed schedule buffer. Oakport must move by three weeks. Benefits remain achievable if two decisions are made this week.

Reporting date: 30 June 2027 · Audience: COO, CFO, operations director, program sponsor and site leads · Source: user brief.

02 Executive status

Amber overall: integration drives the exception

Overall Amber Completion 2 of 6 live Forecast 15 Nov EAC €8.67m Buffer 6 days
WorkstreamRAGCurrent factNext milestone
Site rolloutAmber2 of 6 live; Rivermark readyRivermark go-live 12 Jul
Core platformGreen99.93% uptime over 30 daysRelease 3.4 on 8 Jul
ERP integrationRed17 priority defects; 6 block OakportBurn-down to 4 by 16 Jul
Data migrationAmber98.6% record pass rateOakport rehearsal 19 Jul
TrainingGreen684 of 720 users certifiedOakport completion 23 Jul
BenefitsAmber€0.62m annualized vs €0.71m planValidate Rivermark after 30 days
02 / 10
03 Milestone movement

Oakport moves three weeks; completion moves seven days

10 Mar

North Quay

10 Mar → 10 Mar
Live

28 Apr

Vale Cross

21 Apr → 28 Apr
Live

12 Jul

Rivermark

12 Jul → 12 Jul
Ready

30 Aug

Oakport

9 Aug → 30 Aug
+21 days

4 Oct

Cedar Run

20 Sep → 4 Oct
+14 days

15 Nov

South Gate

8 Nov → 15 Nov
+7 days

Critical path

Baseline completion was 8 November. The current forecast is 15 November, while critical-path buffer has fallen from 28 days in April to 6 days now.

Movement calculated from the original and current go-live dates supplied in the user brief.

03 / 10
04 Site rollout

Two sites are stable; Rivermark is ready

Six-site rollout sequence
SiteOriginal go-liveCurrent go-liveMovementStatusFirst 14-day accuracy
North Quay10 Mar10 Mar0 daysLive99.2%
Vale Cross21 Apr28 Apr+7 daysLive98.8%
Rivermark12 Jul12 Jul0 daysReadyNot live
Oakport9 Aug30 Aug+21 daysAt riskNot live
Cedar Run20 Sep4 Oct+14 daysWatchNot live
South Gate8 Nov15 Nov+7 daysWatchNot live
Next gate

Conduct the Rivermark go/no-go on 10 July for go-live on 12 July.

04 / 10
05 Integration recovery

Defect closure is improving, but six still block Oakport

Priority defects open
31272420171274 Fri -4Fri -2Current16 Jul
ActualRecovery target
142
of 168 interfaces accepted
9
interfaces currently in test
17
priority defects remain
6
defects block Oakport
Recovery method

Daily defect room, freeze noncritical changes and add two vendor engineers for six weeks.

Source: user brief. Recovery dates correspond to the next three Fridays, ending 16 July.

05 / 10
06 Budget and schedule

Recovery lifts EAC by €0.27m, or 3.2%

€8.40mApproved
+€0.19mIntegration
+€0.11mSite support
−€0.03mTravel
€8.67mEAC
€5.76m
actual plus committed through June
68.6%
of approved budget committed or spent, derived
+7 days
completion movement from 8 to 15 Nov
6 days
critical-path buffer, down from 28
Derived calculation

€5.76m ÷ €8.40m = 68.6%. EAC variance is €8.67m − €8.40m = €0.27m.

Source: user brief. Bridge components reconcile from approved budget to estimate at completion.

06 / 10
07 Benefits and operations

Live sites show the operating case is working

6.6 min
average pick time, down from 7.8 minutes
1.9%
inventory adjustments, down from 3.1% of lines
−11%
overtime hours at the two live sites
99.0%
combined order accuracy vs 98.4% baseline
Labor productivity €0.31m
Errors and credits €0.21m
Overtime €0.10m
Labor productivity€0.31m
Fewer errors and credits€0.21m
Lower overtime€0.10m
€0.62m
annualized gross benefit live, versus €0.71m plan

Source: user brief. Benefit shares are derived from €0.31m, €0.21m and €0.10m, totaling €0.62m.

07 / 10
08 Risks and issues

Integration is the quantified threat; ownership gaps remain

Risk or issueProbability / impactQuantificationResponseOwner
ERP integration defectsHigh / High€0.34m exposure; 17 priority defectsDaily defect room; change freeze; two vendor engineersIvo Marin
Oakport peak-season collisionMedium / HighNo go-live after 5 Sep; 6-day stabilization windowMove Oakport to 30 AugNot specified in brief
Data-quality exceptionsMedium / Medium18,420 of 1.31m failed first pass; 13,270 correctedCorrect remaining exceptions; rehearse 19 JulNot specified in brief
Supervisor coverageMedium / Medium14 of 18 Oakport floor champions certifiedCertify four remaining champions by 23 JulNot specified in brief
Governance gap

The supplied evidence names only the integration-risk owner. The sponsor should confirm accountable owners for the other three risks when the revised integrated plan is published.

Source: user brief. Missing owners are shown explicitly rather than inferred.

08 / 10
09 Recovery plan

Two decisions are required this week

01
Decision 1

By 3 July

Authorize €0.22m contingency for the integration recovery team.

02
Decision 2

By 5 July

Approve Oakport's move from 9 August to 30 August and the downstream dates already in the deck.

Consequence

Both decisions preserve the 15 November completion forecast and keep the €0.62m live annualized benefit case achievable.

09 / 10
10 Recovery plan

Five dated actions protect the revised sequence

7 Jul

Publish revised plan

Reflect approved site dates and recovery resources.

10 Jul

Gate Rivermark

Conduct go/no-go for the 12 Jul launch.

16 Jul

Close blockers

Close six Oakport blockers; reduce priority defects to four.

19 Jul

Rehearse Oakport

Validate migrated data and operational readiness.

23 Jul

Complete coverage

Certify four remaining Oakport floor champions.

People

Add two engineers

Vendor engineers join the integration response for six weeks.

Control

Freeze noncritical change

Protect defect capacity and platform stability.

Cadence

Run a daily defect room

Track closure, retest and escalation against the 16 July target.

Source: user brief. Action owners were not supplied and should be assigned in the revised integrated plan.

10 / 10
1 / 6 Save a PDF at unpaper.ai